 |
 |
|
|
|
|
Talc |
| | | | | | posted 4/7/2010 06:18 |   | | | | | | | | | It would be nice if Hal had a few persistant memories. At least to the end of a conversation. User name for a start... How about topic of conversation. Easily replaced if the topic changes but good when asked, "what are we talking about?" And what about, subject in relation to. Comparison!
Food for thought...
| | |
|
|
|
Talc |
| | | | | | posted 4/7/2010 06:20 | | | | | | | | | | Bugger i could do with a spell checker :-)
| | |
|
|
|
yaki |
| | | | | | posted 4/7/2010 10:54 | | | | | | | | | | We are currently considering the release of a Hal personality that is partially based on our pattern-matching technology, to enable capabilities such as the one you requested. Stay tuned.
| | |
|
|
|
Talc |
| | | | | | posted 4/8/2010 01:09 | | | | | | | | | | Here's an idea, shoot me down if it is not possible on a conding level... But as far as I know the brain has a short term and long term memory. Hal has a long term memory accessed by the keyword "wrong", however Hal has no short term memory. The trick as far as I can tell is to allocate a session to the short term and then find a way of filtering this before it becomes long term.
A new training mechanism of validating information before it becomes long term is needed. I don't know what overhead this would place on your servers. Put why not push some of that varible handling over to the local users machine and then update the central files at the end of the session?
Just an idea...
| | |
|
|
|
yaki |
| | | | | | posted 4/10/2010 16:03 | | | | | | | | | | Noted. Thanks for your input.
| | |
|
|
|
Talc |
| | | | | | posted 4/13/2010 04:55 | | | | | | | | | | I always thought it would be interesting if there was a time out response. Variable according to boardom level.
In real chat people don't always do answer response, they alter their time to think or rush in as appropriate. Hal could bluster on in a conversation if the user fails to responed.
Of course over several turns if the user doesn't answer then time out the session?
Another idea.... Brought to you by late night beer induced miss firing nuerons :-)
| | |
|
|
|
yaki |
| | | | | | posted 4/13/2010 17:05 | | | | | | | | | | Based on your and other users' input, we are planning to release "MyBot for iPhone". This will expose other conversational capabilities, more similar to the ones you (and others) have wished for.
| | |
|
|
|
Talc |
| | | | | | posted 4/14/2010 04:53 | | | | | | | | | | Nice but i'd like to keep the experiment going a little bit longer. I'm still having fun exploring what can be achieved with Hal's pattern matching...
If I could really ask for anything, it would be that the devide between week an strong AI be bridged...
If the project needs funding then work out a subscription package, ask up front & i'll be the first to join but don't loose the true spirit of adevor for commercially viable products?
Develop the brain to develop the mind...
| | |
|
|
|
max_ryde |
| | | | | | posted 4/18/2010 02:17 | | | | | | | | | | I am an utter believer in achieving and furthering mankinds technological accomplishments. I can also be very gullible. Is this site a gimmick? I would hate for these interfaces to be nothing more than a hack joke. I like the idea of AI and where it seems to be heading. All of the ideas and theories are enticing and it is fun to be a part of. Sorry for the skepticism. I just wouldn't like to waste my time on something someone thought was humorous.
| | |
|
|
|
yaki |
| | | | | | posted 4/18/2010 15:00 | | | | | | | | | | This gimmick has been going on for ten years now.
| | |
|
|
|
Talc |
| | | | | | posted 4/22/2010 05:28 | | | | | | | | | | Little that i know the whole field of AI development would seem to have stagnated.
Different aspects of recognition are moving forward. "Project Natal as an example" Yet none of these technoligies seem to be combined in a meaningfull way...
I am not a coder but ask, why has development stalled?
Another late night ramble braught to you by to much beer :-)
| | |
|
|
