 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |  I_seek_LifemateGirlfriend |
|  |  |  |  |  | posted 9/1/2008 12:29 |      |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | My recent conclusion after almost 30 years of trying to find the key to develop AI able to integrate all data for robotics, is a simple control made from a knowledge base that focuses on almost unlimited answers and updates to my proposed following "AI priority question for aquisition of an encyclopedia of relevant data listings which = the ongoing answers to
the Question: "What are the Destiny Options of each thing, named existance, word or concept". Then all the answers of course would in due course name other items and things and logically the Destiny Options of all the things so named would be affected by the existence of the listings that named them; and therefore could be updated accordingly. It would automatically have rebounding interactivity. Control would be achieved by input of will for specific options to occur that are possible within the scope of the delineated Destiny Options reality. Am I right in
this prediction for the key control for unlimited capacity A.I. ?
|  |  | My website, I am age 55 |  |  |
|
 |
 |  will i dream |
|  |  |  |  |  | posted 9/1/2008 15:13 |      |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | i have read your post 3 times and looked at the link to your site.
to be honest - i cant completely follow your idea -
it seems you are just trying to describe a process simmilar to human thought process - input generate revelant info - reboubnd etc
"Control would be achieved by input of will for specific options to occur that are possible within the scope of the delineated Destiny Options reality"
i mean - err - what - err help
jesus man - can you put your post again - make it more straight forward then we might be abel to give you an answer
cheers
|  |  |
|
 |
 |  Kinnison |
|  |  |  |  |  | posted 9/3/2008 22:50 |      |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | sorry I dont get your message either or what it has to do with proteins...
|  |  |
|
 |
 |  I_seek_LifemateGirlfriend |
|  |  |  |  |  | posted 9/5/2008 06:37 |      |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Sorry I did not explain well enough. When i said that input of WILL would enable control of the AI system I meant that the user has to define an objective that was not going to happen except for will of the user and then the AI system calculates a logical path of possible cause and effect from data about Destiny Options. The point is the system would not be pre-programmed to do anything in the outside world or respond unprompted to anything in the outside world, rather it would do thinking only -to find how to do any goal the user specifies at input and this may include giving the user some preliminary subordinate or coefficient Destiny Options to select from that help define which way the user could achive any user sought goal and what the consequences would be of alternatiwe pathways to such goal. Futhermore, whether the user seemingly defines conflicting goals and objectives (considering over time the user might want short term projects to support other longterm user defined goals)
The system would help the user to percieve future possibilities and then according to the choices of the user, fill in the workload definition details towards achieving a progressive series of complementary sub-goals.
I will try to re-write the whole thing and I welcome more questions or reasons for doubts about the concept.
|  |  | Last edited by I_seek_LifemateGirlfriend @ 9/5/2008 7:07:00 AM |  |  |
|
 |